DTC Daily DTC DAILY FUNNELS
Blume
← Breakdowns Funnel breakdown · Blume · captured 2026-09-25 draft · awaiting review

Blume has its founder sell a cystic-acne oil that works under the skin, then makes that same under-the-skin promise reason one of a numbered listicle that ends on a 43% buy box with a 30-day money-back guarantee.

The Listicle32 ads · 0 livelongest running 326 doffer: 43% SAVINGS + FREE GIFT open in library ↗

1 · The argument, in one line

Top ad opens
“Excuse me, are you the founder of Bloom?”
→
Page headline
“5 Reasons Blume is a Must-Have for Hormonal Acne”
→
Offer
“43% SAVINGS + FREE GIFT, then 30 Day Money Back Guarantee”

Message match: Continuous. The ads and the page speak to the same person, someone with hormonal and cystic acne, and the page reuses the ads' 'I struggled with hormonal and cystic acne for 8 months' review. The discount is the part that does not carry over.

2 · The ad set

creatives20 of 32 ads labelled, 19 distinct creatives: ranks 10 and 15 are the same TV segment; 15 videos, 5 statics
formatsFounder-led 9 · Product demonstration 3 · UGC talking head 2 · Discount callout 2 · Lifestyle 1 · X reasons 1 · Before/after 1 · other (results-timeline infographic) 1
hooksOutcome 6 · Question 3 · Curiosity 3 · Story 3 · Problem 2 · Offer 2 · Demonstration 1
angles9 distinct: Desired outcome 6 · Unique mechanism 4 · Simplicity 2 · Identity 2 · Cost saving 2 · Speed 1 · Novelty 1 · Convenience 1 · Pain avoidance 1
proofTestimonials 17 · Guarantee 6 · Authority 5 · Customer count 4 · Reviews 4 · Statistics 3 · Demonstration 2 · Before/after 2
Diversity read

This is a portfolio: one persona (hormonal acne) seen from nine angles. The openers differ a lot: "To my PCOS girly, hormonal girly or acne prone skin girly," goes for identity, "If you stop eating these three foods, your hormonal acne will go away forever" is a curiosity list, "Eight years ago, I dropped out of law school to go all in on our skincare company, Bloom." is a founder story, and "SUMMER SALE: 30% Off" is a plain discount. The copy under the creative barely changes, though: 17 of the 20 ads carry the same Brittney H review as primary text.

3 · The top ad, beat by beat

0:00Surprising open“Excuse me, are you the founder of Bloom?”
0:03Problem“What would you recommend for Cystic Acne?”
0:07Agitation“you do, it feels like it's impossible to make them go away.”
0:08Solution“So we have just recreated this really unique oil.”
0:09Mechanism“It's not just any oil, it's antibacterial and anti-inflammatory.”
0:29Mechanism“So it brings down that size and redness of pimples overnight.”
0:46Credibility“As dermatologists tested, it has helped over 500,000 customers feel they're acting for”
1:05Offer“And most importantly, if you are happy with the results, we offer you full 30-day money”
Founder-led · Question hook · Unique mechanism angle ("It's not just any oil, it's antibacterial and anti-inflammatory.") · 70 s video, 38 days live

4 · The page, in order

01 Hero + problem 02 Reasons 1-3: root, barrier, oil balance (the spine) 03 Reasons 4-6: social proof, deep breakouts, clean formula 04 Buy box + guarantee + urgency 05 Before & afters + testimonials 06 Reviews widget (4,023 reviews) 07 Second buy box + guarantee 08 Newsletter capture (10% off)

The whole argument, six numbered reasons, runs before the first price, and most of the customer proof (before and afters, testimonials, the reviews widget) sits between the two buy boxes. Reason 1 repeats the top ad's pattern: name deep, painful breakouts, then answer with a formula that works before they surface.

5 · Why it works

  • Ad and page name the same sufferer.. The top ad's problem line is cystic acne, not acne in general, and the page's first reason describes exactly those breakouts. A viewer who clicks on the ad finds the page is already about them. · “What would you recommend for Cystic Acne?” · “these breakouts tend to be stubborn, cystic, and hard to treat with traditional acne products”
  • The ad's mechanism is the listicle's reason one.. The founder says the oil works before a pimple comes to a head, and reason 1 on the page makes the same promise in longer form. The click lands on the claim the ad just made, now spelled out. · “it actually reduces that redness before your pimple ever goes to a head.” · “By targeting acne at the root—while it's still forming under the skin”
  • The same number shows up on both sides.. The founder's customer count in the ad reappears on the page, both in reason 4 and as a banner above the reviews. Repeating one figure lets the page confirm the ad instead of adding new claims. · “it has helped over 500,000 customers” · “500,000 Happy Acne-Free Customers”
  • Risk reversal closes the ad and anchors both buy boxes.. The top ad ends on the money-back promise, another ad puts it in the headline, and the page repeats it in both buy boxes. A skeptic who has 'tried everything' hears the same safety net three times. · “we offer you full 30-day money” · “Clear Your Hormonal Acne Or Your Money Back” · “30 Day Money Back Guarantee”

6 · What to take

  • Make reason 1 of your listicle the same mechanism your best ad sells, in the same words where you can (Blume: under the skin, before it comes to a head).
  • Choose one proof number (Blume uses 500,000 customers) and put it in the ad voiceover, in the body of the page and above the reviews.
  • Say the guarantee out loud at the end of the ad and print it again in every buy box on the page.

7 · Watch-outs

  • The offer changes at the handoff: the ads promise 30% off ("SUMMER SALE: 30% Off", "You can get the Clear Skin Kit for 30% off today"), two ad images show 50% and 35%, and the page sells "43% SAVINGS + FREE GIFT". Anyone who clicked for 30% has to work out the new number.
  • The same review is credited to Brittney H in the ads' primary text and to Amanda S on the page, and the headline promises 5 reasons while the page numbers 6. Small things, but a careful reader could spot both.
FOR THE REVIEWER
  • The input's section split is coarse: section 0 holds the intro and reasons 1-3, and reasons 4-6, the before and afters, testimonials, reviews widget and both buy boxes exist only in page_text. page_flow moves 03 to 07 were built from page_text order and have no section index or tags; a reviewer should check them against the screenshot.
  • The page text runs the reason 5 body before its heading ("5. Prevents Those Deep, Painful Breakouts" appears after the copy about cystic pimples); this looks like a capture ordering artefact.
  • Offer mismatch rests on ad headlines and one transcript line; the 50% and 35% figures come from ad images and are not quotable from text.
  • Top ad transcript has garbled words ("black human tea roasted in blue tansy", "Lune") and cuts off at "full 30-day money"; beats avoid the garbled lines where possible.
Meta Ad Library pull (32 ads, 0 live, 20 in input; pull date not in input); page captured 2026-09-25; transcripts for 14 of 15 videos (ad 1245098942012969's transcript is unusable); labels verified 2026-09-27. Nothing here is estimated. Every quote is copied from the ad or the page. Meta publishes no spend or results; nothing here is a performance claim.